The A7s II features a microphone input, headphone output and a Micro HDMI port. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. Looks like Phillip Bloom did a low light comparison GH5s vs A7r3 (s35 crop). The GH5s has an impressive list of formats and codecs for video to choose from. In our tests, we found that the GH5s was about a stop to a stop and a half better in low-light. The GH5S sacrifices megapixels and in-body IS in exchange for larger pixels which, in theory at least, should result in better low light performance. while maintaining the same diagonal angle of view. There are a few reviewers and sites claiming that the Panasonic GH5S beats the Sony a7SII at low light performance and I just don’t see it. The A7s II is compatible with a good range of native FE lenses and you can mount all DSLR and full frame lenses via an adapter without losing the original field of view. On one side, the Sony has a full sensor out the box, amazing low light compatibility and has image stabilization with S-Log. It can work in conjunction with OSS lenses (3 axes on the sensor + 2 axes on the lens) and with manual focus lenses that don’t feature electronic contacts (3 axes only). Panasonic GH5s with my Metabones Speedbooster XL 0.64x VS. Sony A7 Mark III. Anyone who has owned a Sony mirrorless camera will agree that the menu system isn’t the easiest to navigate. Concerning the rear screen, the GH5s comes with a multi-angle LCD that is 3.2” in size, has higher resolution (1,600k dots) and features touch capabilities. The two cameras rely on a contrast detection AF system. The Sony monitor can only be tilted up and down, is slightly smaller (3.0”) with less resolution and has no touch gestures. The Sony has several customisable Picture Profiles inherited from the Cine-Alta professional series. Unsurprisingly we begin with one of the most important differences: the sensor size. The GH5s will retail for approximately $2500 / £2200 / €2550. ISO sensitivity. Thank you! Thank you! The Sony can record at 120fps by comparison. Concerning the connection options, the A7s II has a microphone input and headphone output as well as a Micro HDMI port. The A7s II menu is more time consuming to navigate but the Fn menu with 12 editable slots is quite handy. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! Their respective mirrorless systems are extremely popular amongst amateur filmmakers, and have even been used for certain scenes in high-end productions. The A7s II, by comparison, might become more of a niche product for those who desire that full frame look and require more extreme low light performance. The Sony camera has 4K capabilities (UHD – 3840 x 2160) up to 30fps and 1080p video up to 120fps. The GH series from Panasonic has always been more video-centric in the eyes of consumers despite offering an equal set of features for stills as well. We haven’t tested the GH5s yet but the improvements made to the GH5 are rather good so hopefully this should carry over to the S model as well. The A7s II has seven customisable Picture Profiles with settings inherited from its Cine-Alta professional camcorders. In our experience, the Sony was rather slow with anything that moves at a decent pace. Other useful options you’ll find on the Lumix are waveform and vector scope monitors. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sony A7 III and Panasonic GH5S side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. The GH5 can record for hours continuously, the A7s II is limited to 30 minutes of continuous recording before it shuts down and has to be restarted. A7s II: 169 contrast detection points. The 2x crop factor when adapting a S35 or full frame lens can be an advantage or disadvantage depending on the focal length and shot you want to achieve but speed-booster adapters can be quite handy for that if you don’t want to lose too much of the original angle of view of the lens. 01:46 (6 May, 2016) Sony a7S II 4K sample video 3 from NYC. The GH5 features an upgraded version with more entries per page and a more elegant/minimalistic design. The A7 III can shoot up to 10fps with continuous AF. The Sony uses a 35mm format sensor that is four times larger than the four thirds chip found inside the Lumix camera. In our tests, we found the camera slower than those that use Sony’s hybrid AF – even in low light – despite the better sensitivity. Panasonic GH5S vs Sony A7R III: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Some examples of features found on the GH5 that you must pay for and download for the A7s II are: However, to Sony’s credit, there is a wider selection of features (around 33 at the time of writing) and the apps are being updated all the time. Furthermore the colour science, while tonally improved, is noticeably darker than the A7SII when evenly exposed. It lacks a low-pass filter and incorporates Multipixel Luminance Generation and Intelligent Detail Processing, which together allow for extra sharpness and detail. HoustonTexan75. The NP-FW50 battery drains very quickly when you start recording 4K video. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. I know folks who own proper cinema cameras who were pretty floored that all those features ran for only $2,000. In our experience, it isn’t particularly fast for either stills or video and the performance deteriorates in poor light conditions. The GH5 will record at up to 1080/180p, versus 1080/120p for the A7s II. Larger sensor. Unlike most recent Lumix cameras, the GH5s doesn’t feature 5-axis stabilisation and must rely on the OIS of select lenses or third party stabilisation systems. Although the A7s II’s OLED electronic viewfinder has a higher magnification (0.78x vs. 0.76x), the GH5’s offers more resolution (3,680k dots vs. 2,359K dots). Although I have used and appreciated the great low light capabilities of the A7s II, I wouldn’t hesitate to get a GH5s for myself if I had to choose between the two. Below you can watch a quick video Nick sent to Newsshooter that shows the low-light capabilities of the new GH5. Touchscreen. So the Sony has the advantage in low light, sure. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. Distinguished for its impressive performance at high ISOs, the Sony A7s II can deliver usable results for stills and video up to 51200 ISO, with 102400 ISO being the very limit for extreme situations. The A7s II is more expensive with a price tag of around $2700 / £2500 / €2600. Noise reduction can lead to false conclusions of sensor performance. In our experience, Sony batteries, which haven’t grown any larger or more powerful since the original A7 was released in 2013, don’t last very long, especially if you shoot a lot of 4K video on the A7s II. I heavily researched both of these cameras and both cater to me very well. To combat noise in low-light, it uses 3-dimension colour control and precise noise reduction techniques at sensitivities up to 25600 ISO. Thanks to two separate firmware updates that will be available in mid-2017, it will be able to record this way with the IPB or All-Intra compression algorithm in Full HD at any frame rate and 4K up 30fps. The Sony uses a 35mm format sensor that is four times larger than the four thirds chip found inside the Lumix camera. This technology is complex, but once the light is captured by the sensor’s pixels, it is then processed by two analogue circuits to a digital signal, rather than one circuit as with the GH5. 3. Be careful when evaluating the GH5s vs A7sII low-light performance videos - look at both noise *and* detail, and look for scenes with movement rather than just locked-down static shots. The GH5 has a range of 200 to 25600 ISO and extended “pull” values down to … If you want more colour information, you need to use the HDMI output that gives you a 4:2:2 8-bit signal. Concerning the continuous shooting speed, the GH5s is faster with a maximum of 12fps or 8fps with continuous AF. The GH5 has a full-sized HDMI port and audio in/out too. Within the article, there are affiliate links. The same options apply for the Cinema 4K format (17:9) and you also get an Anamorphic 4K mode that works up to 60p (8-bit only). Not only does it surpass the GH5, but also most of the competition (apart from the Nikon D5 and the previous A7s). Fewer pixels spread across the surface means that they are larger, collect more light and produce less noise at high sensitivities than sensors with more megapixels. The A7s II uses 169 points and has a minimum sensitivity of -4Ev. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. The A7III footage is rarely usable beyond 52,200, but I’ve frequently used A7SII footage at ISO 102,400 and sometimes up to 204,800. The GH5 houses a newly developed 20.3MP Four Thirds sensor. Concerning the picture profiles, you can find two log gamma curves on the A7s II (S-Log2 and S-Log3) and one on the GH5s (V-Log L). The A7s II uses an OLED panel too but with less resolution (2,360k dots) and a lower refresh rate of 60fps. Concerning 1080p and slow motion capabilities, the maximum frame rate is 180fps. The Sony A7s II might have better dynamic range and low-light performance, but when it comes to the rest of the specifications, the GH5 looks more impressive. This is how Panasonic managed to improve the ISO range considerably in comparison to any other Micro Four Thirds camera on the market. Less expensive. Unsurprisingly we begin with one of the most important differences: the sensor size. Please make a rolling shutter comparison between GH5S, GH5 and A7sII :) Like. Quote; Share this post. As for connectivity, the GH5s again offers more versatility with a full sized HDMI port, audio in and out and a USB Type C port. The A7s mark II can record 4K internally up to 30fps in 4:2:0 8-bit with the XAVC S codec and 100Mbps bitrate. Better low-light … First of all, the GH5 features a fully weatherproof design that is dust, splash and freeze proof down to -10°C, while the A7s II is only dust and splash resistant. Better low-light performance means you’ll be able to capture more with less. When viewed on a large monitor, it appears the GH5s begins to fall apart at ISO 6400. Light Painting (a 4K/6K feature known as Light Composition on the GH5). The A7s II has a single native ISO of 1600 and a range that goes from 100 to 102400, with extended values up to 409600. The Panasonic camera has more physical controls with 16 function buttons, a drive dial and an AF joystick. Finally, the GH5 comes with more controls, such as 20 function buttons (including the on-screen virtual buttons) and an AF joystick, though only the A7s II has a dedicated exposure compensation dial. The GH5 is the first Lumix camera to feature the second generation Depth from Defocus contrast detection system with 225 focus points, a new motion detection algorithm and a 480fps drive speed. The A7s II sports a full-frame 12.2MP Exmor CMOS sensor. However it has a slightly higher magnification of 0.78x. from Dan Chung on Vimeo. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. The A7s II integrates in-body stabilisation with 5 axes. In this section, We are going to illustrate Panasonic GH5S and Sony A7S II side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. 00:22 (5 Feb, 2018) Panasonic GH5S vs Sony a7S II low light comparison. If you decide to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. The A7s II only has one UHS-I slot. Panasonic Lumix GH5 – Can it See in the Dark? The GH5s has a more well organised menu system with a My Menu page where you can shortcut your favourite settings, as well as a Quick Menu. You can get more colour sampling in 4:2:2 via the HDMI output but it remains 8-bit (the GH5s outputs 10-bit via the HDMI port). The electronic shutter of the GH5 allows for a maximum 1/16,000 shutter speed, which is faster than the A7s II’s maximum speed of 1/8000s. With the 4K or 6K Photo modes, the GH5 can record a 4K video at 60fps or a 6K video at 30fps and allow you to save any frame as a 8MP or 18MP JPG respectively. Another characteristic of the GH5s sensor is that it is multi aspect: the surface is slightly larger than the area covered by the lens and that allows you to to switch aspect ratios (4:3, 3:2, 16:9 etc.) The GH5s features a new 10.2MP chip whose megapixel count is rather low by today’s standards but helps the ISO performance, which is exactly the same concept behind the 12.2 MP chip of the A7s camera. In my experience, the A7SII and A7III are very similar in low light up until around ISO 52,200. Next in the comparison is the Panasonic GH5S vs. the EVA1. 35mm vs 4/3. According to Lumix Ambassador Nick Driftwood in his conversation with Newsshooter, the GH5’s low-light performance is “a definite improvement in performance over the GH4”, appearing useable up to 6400 ISO. Third, like most of the latest mirrorless flagships, the GH5 sports two SD-card slots with UHS-II compatibility. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. The GH5 and A7s II both use a contrast detection autofocus system with minimum sensitivity of -4Ev. The five-year gap between the launch of the a7S II and the announcement of the a7S III had some people wondering whether Sony had given up on the idea of a video-focused a7 model. Underlining the low light improvement, the GH5S offers a Dual Native sensitivity range. The GH5s uses the same battery as the GH5 which is very good. Also important to highlight is that the GH5s can record for an unlimited time in 4K and 1080p while the Sony has a 30 minute limit per clip. All the internal recording is done in 4:2:0 8-bit. The smaller sensor of the GH5s will render more depth of field with the same aperture which may displease those looking for the shallowest depth of field possible, but in other cases, can be useful. Note that some cashback offers may be available in certain countries and at specific times of the year. Of course, the question on all our minds is: how do they compare? It is not the fastest in the Lumix lineup but it is the most sensitive at -5Ev. In this scenario, one might assume that since the EVA1 has a larger sensor, it should perform much better than the GH5S in low light. In this case, the higher resolution can put the Panasonic at a slight advantage for still photography in certain situations. Imaging Resource compared the new GH5s vs the A7sII: “At both 12,800 and 25,600, the GH5S looks slightly better than the A7S II at the same ISOs, which is both unexpected and subjectively highly impressive for a camera featuring a sensor that is a fraction the size of the other. Thanks! Finally, with lenses that lack electronic contacts altogether, such as manual focus lenses, the camera uses just 3 axes instead of 5. Your personal data won't be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully. In the following videos (made by DPreview and Pro AV TV) you can get a nice first glimpse of how the Panasonic compares to the A7s II – via 43rumors. Sony includes two in the box but it won’t be enough for an entire day of shooting. In this case it is the larger sensor coupled with the low megapixel count that helps you achieve better performance. For this reason, we usually pack around 2-3 batteries for a full day of shooting. A battery grip is also available. The GH5 too combines sensor and optical stabilisation using a system called Dual I.S. To help others in answering I shoot 120fps which I convert to real-time (I have a 120Hz laptop). $2298 vs $2998* Save money for lenses or accessories. The larger sensor allows for more dynamic range, and the fact that there are fewer pixels spread across a larger surface area means that each photosite is larger, enabling minimal noise and impressive sensitivity up to 102,400 ISO (expandable to 409,600 ISO). It would be impossible to begin this comparison without mentioning the obvious difference in sensor size and resolution. Higher extended ISO can give more low-light flexibility. It includes all the positive aspects of its twin sister, the GH5: better ergonomics, a user friendly body and menu system, and all the settings you need for professional video, with the added benefit of better ISO performance which has been, up until now, one of the only real limitations of the system. While one battery might not be enough for an entire day of shooting 4K, it definitely lasts longer than the Sony battery. In this comparison preview, we will be looking at how the 1.5-year-old Sony A7s II and the recently announced Panasonic Lumix GH5 compare, since these are the two models that are most likely to interest filmmakers. Never has there been so much choice in the filmmaking world as there is today when it comes to compact systems capable of producing astounding video quality. If we get the chance to test the two cameras side-by-side, we will publish a full comparison. If most of your photography or videography takes place in very poor light conditions, the A7s II is the obvious choice. Ethics statement: The information supplied in this article is based upon our experience with the Sony A7s II and a quick hands-on with a pre-productions GH5S. Our newsletter goes out every week on Sunday. Ethics statement: The information supplied in this article is based on the official specifications found on the Panasonic / Sony websites and our personal experience with Panasonic and Sony cameras. An unfortunate characteristic of Sony cameras is that you have to download a mix of free and paid apps from the Sony Play Memories store to have access to extra features which tend to be included by default on camera models from other brands. It would be impossible to begin this comparison without mentioning the obvious difference in sensor size and resolution. The camera will also maintain a 4:2:0 8-bit option that will raise 4K recording up to 50/60fps. The GH5s uses the Micro Four Thirds mount, making it compatible with a vast selection of lenses from Lumix, Olympus and third party companies. The DfD technology identifies the subject in all frames and analyses it with more resolution. However, we cannot expect it to match the performance of the Sony, not only because full-frame sensors almost always outperform crop sensors in poor light conditions but also because the A7s II model was specifically designed for low-light work. According to the official statement made by Panasonic, the GH5 offers 5 stops of compensation and these 5 stops are maintained up to 280mm with select Mega O.I.S. The A7s II is capable of a maximum of 5fps with speed priority and 2.5fps with focus priority, while the GH5 can manage 9fps in C-AF or 12fps in S-AF. The GH5s includes Cine-Like D, Cine-Like V, Like709 and a Hybrid Log Gamma profile. More sensor area. ~ 8.40 vs 4.51 microns. It’s very unfortunate there is no option to turn of noise reduction, since it’s tough now to get a clean filmic look with natural fine film grain which the A7SII does have. The second generation of A7 cameras, comprising the A7 II, A7r II and A7s II, was the first in the Sony E-mount range to integrate 5-axis sensor shift technology. lenses, the camera continues to use 5 axes on the sensor. The GH5s features an OLED viewfinder with 3,680k dots, 0.76x magnification and a fast refresh rate of 120fps. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! For this reason, it has frequently been called the “low-light monster” of the camera world. A professional crew would be more likely to stabilise the camera with a hardware system which is why Panasonic decided to ditch the IBIS on the GH5s. lenses. However the way in which these two sensors have been designed follows a similar logic.
2020 gh5s vs a7sii low light